Received: from beak.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl) (->ota+space.digests)
ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr1/ota/Mailbox/cZeXF4C00VcJ81JE4:>;
Tue, 9 Jan 90 13:58:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from beak.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail
ID </usr/spool/ViceMsgQueue/QF.gZeHoWa00VcJI1:E8A>;
Andrew Palfreyman a wet bird never flies at night time sucks
andrew@dtg.nsc.com there are always two sides to a broken window
------------------------------
Date: 2 Jan 90 20:47:31 GMT
From: concertina!fiddler@sun.com (Steve Hix)
Subject: Re: Photographer of the decade
In article <1990Jan1.213436.16129@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>, tdrinkar@cosmos.acs.calpoly.edu (Terrell Drinkard) writes:
>
> erc@khijol.UUCP (Edwin R. Carp) writes:
> dakramer@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Anthony Kramer) writes:
> >>The editors of the magazine 'American Photo' nominated Voyager 2 as
> >>the photographer of the decade, although they leave the final award
> >Voyager, my eye! Ansel Adams gets MY vote.
>
> Not to be overly picky, but Adams' most famous pictures were taken
> during his 1916 trip to Yosemite, not during the 1980s;
?????!
Adams' career was at its peak during the '30s and '40s. He was one
of the founding members of f64, an influential group of realist
pictorial photographers, such as Edward Weston and Imogene Cunningham,
who were reacting to the soft-focus, hyperromantic approach of earlier
photographers such as Steiglitz. (Who *was* active before the '20s.)
Ansel was probably still practicing his piano in preparation for a
career as a concert pianist in 1916, though.
------------
"...Then anyone who leaves behind him a written manual, and likewise
anyone who receives it, in the belief that such writing will be clear
and certain, must be exceedingly simple-minded..."
Plato, _Phaedrus_ 275d
------------------------------
Date: 2 Jan 90 07:03:33 GMT
From: zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!ditmela!yarra!melba.bby.oz.au!leo!gnb@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Gregory N. Bond)
Subject: Re: Launching AUSSAT on Chinese rockets
Enough already!
Stick the politics in talk.politics.im-right-and-youre-wrong. Or whatever.
The >space< relevance of this is that, without the cheap launch of
Long March, the AUSSAT would probably never be launched - it is
marginally economic at best. Not to mention the shortage of launch
slots.
And Bush's ban meant that the very expensive hardware was going to sit
around unused. This is expensive. Who was going to pay for it? Les
Patterson's old pal, the Australian Taxpayer. Through no fault or
decision of our own.
(In reality, AUSSAT is losing buckets of dough on the underutilised
existing satellite. Why launch a new one??)
Greg.
--
Gregory Bond, Burdett Buckeridge & Young Ltd, Melbourne, Australia